Last month, I found myself on yet another late-night video call, watching talented professionals from three different continents talk completely past each other. The Sydney team was already building prototypes, my Frankfurt colleagues were still perfecting the requirements doc, and our Singapore team was caught somewhere in between, trying to translate between these worlds.
I couldn't help but laugh.
Sixteen years into this global leadership thing, and I'm still witnessing the same dance.
The Day I Realized Culture Actually Matters
I remember my first global program like it was yesterday. I walked in confident—armed with my certifications, methodologies, and a binder full of best practices. Three months later, I was drowning.
My Australian team had already implemented solutions while my European colleagues were still drafting documentation requirements. The Aussies thought the Germans were needlessly bureaucratic; the Germans thought the Aussies were recklessly cutting corners.
And me? I was caught in the middle, wondering how such smart people could see the same project so differently.
The Australian Approach: "Let's Just Sort It"
If you've ever worked with Australian teams, you know exactly what I'm talking about. There's something refreshing about their approach:
They dive in. While others are planning the third planning meeting, they've already built a prototype and learned from it.
I'll never forget walking into our Sydney office during a major product pivot. The team had completely restructured the roadmap in just three weeks—no 50-page documents, just focused conversations, clear decisions, and immediate action.
Hierarchy doesn't seem to slow them down either. I've had junior developers challenge my thinking directly—and thank goodness they did, because our products got better as a result.
The European Playbook: "Let's Get This Right"
Then there's what I've seen across many European teams, especially in places like Germany and Switzerland:
Projects begin with meticulous planning. What might feel excessive to others prevents expensive mistakes down the road.
I once griped about the "endless" governance framework our Frankfurt team produced during a banking transformation. Six months later, when regulatory challenges hit us, that documentation saved the company millions. Their approach wasn't slow—it was deliberate risk management that I initially failed to appreciate.
When Different Worlds Collide
The breaking point came during one particularly tense call:
Sydney team: "This is absolutely urgent—we needed it yesterday!"
Munich team: "We need more information. What's driving this timeline? Where's the impact analysis?"
By the end, the Australians saw the Germans as stubborn blockers, and the Germans thought the Australians were being dangerously hasty.
Neither was true—they just spoke different professional languages.
The Human Cost We Don't Talk About
Here's what kept me up at night:
watching good people burn out when these cultural differences went unaddressed.
One of my best project managers in Sydney eventually resigned after months of what she called "picking up slack" due to what she perceived as "analysis paralysis" from other regions. Meanwhile, our German team felt deeply disrespected when their thorough risk assessments were brushed aside as unnecessary delays.
Both sides were miserable, not because they weren't committed, but because they felt misunderstood.
Thanks for reading Insights Via Storytelling! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Finding the Middle Ground: What Actually Worked
After countless failures and a few surprising successes, here's what I've found works:
1. Make Cultural Intelligence Personal
We held "culture clinics" where teams could safely discuss miscommunications. In one memorable session, a team member from Frankfurt finally said: "When you rush through decisions, it feels like you don't value quality." Our Sydney lead responded: "And when every small change requires a committee, it feels like you don't trust us."
That simple exchange changed everything.
2. Create Bridges, Not Walls
Instead of forcing one approach on everyone, we created hybrid processes that respected different styles:
We established "fast lanes" for low-risk decisions while maintaining deeper process for high-stakes moves.
We paired process-oriented team members with execution-focused colleagues—not to change either of them, but to create natural checks and balances.
3. Connect as Humans First
The game-changer wasn't a new framework or methodology—it was building genuine human connections:
We budgeted for in-person kickoffs where teams could share meals, not just meetings.
We hosted virtual "culture exchanges" where team members taught each other local recipes or shared weekend traditions.
One PM started weekly "coffee roulette," randomly pairing people from different regions for 30-minute virtual coffees with a no-work-talk rule.
Your First Steps Toward Cultural Intelligence
If any of this resonates with your experience leading global teams, here's where I'd suggest starting:
First month: Have honest conversations about how different regions approach work. Don't judge—just listen and map the differences.
Next few months: Instead of forcing one approach, blend methodologies that respect diverse working styles.
Ongoing practice: Rotate meeting times so no region always bears the burden of late nights, and create spaces where different approaches are celebrated, not just tolerated.
The Truth About Global Leadership
After sixteen years leading teams across continents, I'm convinced of one thing: the best global leaders don't try to eliminate cultural differences—they amplify them strategically.
Cultural intelligence isn't just about preventing misunderstandings. It's about creating environments where diverse approaches make our work better.
The next time you find yourself frustrated by how "they" do things in another office, pause and ask yourself:
What if their approach isn't wrong—just different? And what if that difference is exactly what your project needs?
